Hegseth Orders Troops to Stop Betting on War Outcomes
The Secretary of Defense argues that personal wagers on military events create signals that enemy intelligence services can exploit to anticipate U.S. actions.
By Natalia Campos ·

The U.S. military is tightening its rules on how its personnel handle personal finances during active operations. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a directive on October 20 that warns service members against using nonpublic information to place bets on prediction markets.
The memo, titled “Do Not Compromise Military Operations for Personal Financial Gain,” was published yesterday by CBS News. It was sent to senior Pentagon leadership, Combatant Command leaders, and Defense Department field activity directors. The core concern is that financial transactions based on military outcomes create visible signals. Hegseth argues that these signals can be aggregated and analyzed by hostile foreign intelligence services. This allows adversaries to anticipate U.S. movements, targets, and timing, potentially putting troops at risk.
Hegseth emphasized that the enemy closely monitors these markets. When a service member or intelligence professional engages in a financial transaction related to a military event, it generates data points. Hostile actors can correlate this data to predict strategic shifts. The Secretary stated that the lives of service members often depend on the enemy not knowing what is coming. He described the force as one that should protect its personnel, not expose them to the enemy for personal financial gain.
The directive applies to all financial platforms. This includes traditional betting services as well as prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi. The rule is strict: Defense Department personnel may not make any financial transaction informed by nonpublic information. It does not matter if the information is classified or unclassified. If it is not public knowledge, it cannot be used to inform a bet.
This warning follows a specific incident that highlighted the risks. In April, a U.S. Army soldier was arrested and charged with using confidential information. The soldier made $410,000 in bets on Polymarket regarding the timing of the military’s capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. This case brought significant attention to the intersection of military operations and digital betting platforms.
Independent analysis has also raised concerns about suspicious activity. An August report from the Anti-Corruption Data Collective identified 152 suspicious wallets. These wallets placed longshot bets on military and defense markets. The group reported that these bets resulted in a combined win of $8 million. This finding suggests that the issue of insider betting is not isolated to a single individual but may be a broader pattern.
Hegseth’s memo aims to prevent betting from warping judgment within the ranks. By restricting how nonpublic information is used, the Department of Defense seeks to maintain operational security. The goal is to ensure that personal financial interests do not influence military decisions or leak strategic information. This approach aligns with long-standing principles of keeping operational details away from potential adversaries.
The outlook for military personnel involves a clearer boundary between professional duties and personal finance. Service members must now be more cautious about when and how they engage with financial platforms. The memo serves as a formal reminder that every transaction can have strategic implications. As prediction markets continue to grow in popularity, the military must adapt its security protocols to address these new vectors of potential information leakage.
Source: Ars Technica





